<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Visual Content: Beyond Tufte</title>
	<atom:link href="http://incisive.nu/2010/beyond-tufte/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://incisive.nu/2010/beyond-tufte/</link>
	<description>Content, Publishing, Editorial</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:56:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2010-03-08 &#171; Arteliance</title>
		<link>http://incisive.nu/2010/beyond-tufte/comment-page-1/#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2010-03-08 &#171; Arteliance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 18:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incisive.nu/?p=138#comment-474</guid>
		<description>[...] Visual Content: Beyond Tufte : Incisive.nu Visual Content: Beyond Tufte : Incisive.nu http://incisive.nu/2010/beyond-tufte/ (tags: via:packrati.us) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Visual Content: Beyond Tufte : Incisive.nu Visual Content: Beyond Tufte : Incisive.nu <a href="http://incisive.nu/2010/beyond-tufte/" rel="nofollow">http://incisive.nu/2010/beyond-tufte/</a> (tags: via:packrati.us) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin</title>
		<link>http://incisive.nu/2010/beyond-tufte/comment-page-1/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 23:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incisive.nu/?p=138#comment-245</guid>
		<description>@Dirk Serious

1. You are incorrect. If you&#039;d clicked through to the chart&#039;s source, linked from the (cropped) image itself and in the caption, you&#039;d have seen the source: the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Which you reference in your next point, so I assume you do, in fact, know that the chart&#039;s data is cited. 

2. This chart doesn&#039;t claim to list &quot;the unemployed,&quot; but rather lists job losses per month, which is something quite different. These are the same job-loss stats all major organizations use in the US, and because they deal only with *new* claims, the usual &quot;doesn&#039;t count people who give up looking&quot; caveat doesn&#039;t apply.

3. If you&#039;re going to come to a blog about content strategy to kvetch about Obama, you&#039;re already on the verge of trolldom; if you do it without getting your own facts straight, you&#039;re wasting everyone&#039;s time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dirk Serious</p>
<p>1. You are incorrect. If you&#8217;d clicked through to the chart&#8217;s source, linked from the (cropped) image itself and in the caption, you&#8217;d have seen the source: the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Which you reference in your next point, so I assume you do, in fact, know that the chart&#8217;s data is cited. </p>
<p>2. This chart doesn&#8217;t claim to list &#8220;the unemployed,&#8221; but rather lists job losses per month, which is something quite different. These are the same job-loss stats all major organizations use in the US, and because they deal only with *new* claims, the usual &#8220;doesn&#8217;t count people who give up looking&#8221; caveat doesn&#8217;t apply.</p>
<p>3. If you&#8217;re going to come to a blog about content strategy to kvetch about Obama, you&#8217;re already on the verge of trolldom; if you do it without getting your own facts straight, you&#8217;re wasting everyone&#8217;s time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirk Serious</title>
		<link>http://incisive.nu/2010/beyond-tufte/comment-page-1/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Serious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 21:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incisive.nu/?p=138#comment-244</guid>
		<description>The Obama graph is a little dubious:
1.There is no source for the data used for the graphic. It is actually inexcusable and scientifically dishonest to omit your sources.

2.There is not an accurate method of determining the number of unemployed. Through the Department of Labor&#039;s statistics you can only determine the number of people who are filing for unemployment, as opposed to the actual number of workers who are unemployed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Obama graph is a little dubious:<br />
1.There is no source for the data used for the graphic. It is actually inexcusable and scientifically dishonest to omit your sources.</p>
<p>2.There is not an accurate method of determining the number of unemployed. Through the Department of Labor&#8217;s statistics you can only determine the number of people who are filing for unemployment, as opposed to the actual number of workers who are unemployed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Importance of visual content development at As-map Blog</title>
		<link>http://incisive.nu/2010/beyond-tufte/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Importance of visual content development at As-map Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incisive.nu/?p=138#comment-77</guid>
		<description>[...] source : http://incisive.nu/2010/beyond-tufte/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] source : <a href="http://incisive.nu/2010/beyond-tufte/" rel="nofollow">http://incisive.nu/2010/beyond-tufte/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connie Malamed</title>
		<link>http://incisive.nu/2010/beyond-tufte/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Connie Malamed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incisive.nu/?p=138#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Good points, Erin. As a content developer for online learning, we too often use graphics for eye candy rather than for the visual explanation of important concepts. Because our brains are hard-wired for graphics, the cost of development is well worth the value in improved communication and learning.
Best,
Connie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points, Erin. As a content developer for online learning, we too often use graphics for eye candy rather than for the visual explanation of important concepts. Because our brains are hard-wired for graphics, the cost of development is well worth the value in improved communication and learning.<br />
Best,<br />
Connie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

